Skip to main content

How many of me are there? The Life and Times of the First Doctor

(Also taken from LJ, though I actually quite liked this little series I had going.)

General note for this entire series: this will, obviously, be a terribly subjective analysis. Firstly, because I'm me, and my ideas of good and bad will certainly vary differently from those of others. Secondly, because I will be basing my musings on an incomplete assemblage of sources. This includes all of the classic serials on DVD, but no others--I know, I know, but I'm fairly new to Who fandom, and I am not buying VHS tapes that won't even fit anywhere in a year or so. It also includes selected Big Finish audios, which are delightful on the whole. A parting note before I dive in to Doctor number 1: I love the new series, I love the old series, I love all the Doctors, and I love pretty much every companion, so, any criticism or picking which follows, comes from a place of love.

An old man, wearing a rather bizarre hat, wanders into a junk yard and finds two nosy school teachers. This is our first introduction to the character of the Doctor, though, at the time, of course, the viewer didn't know that he was the Doctor, let alone that he would be the first in a long lone of actors. The First Doctor presents a rather striking figure immediately. Enigmatic, irascible, and decidedly chilly to the interlopers, the First Doctor was not immediately likable. Indeed, for the first several serials, Ian Chesterton, a dashing science teacher, is the hero of the show, with the Doctor being a trouble-making genius with an unpredictable personality. With time, however, the Doctor emerges to be the central figure of the show, though the first Doctor's era is especially notable, in my opinion, for giving the companions and guest stars quite a bit to do, with the notable exception of Susan, whom the writers seemed to have no idea how to treat. In all, the First Doctor had 8 companions, and was only paired with one companion for the very brief period between Steve's departure and Ben and Polly's arrival. This created a lot of interesting studies in group dynamics and allowed for a flourishing of subplots, which were necessary to fill the 6, 8, and even 12 part stories which filled his time. However, back to the First Doctor.

William Hartnell deserves a great amount of kudos for creating such an iconic role with style and panache. If he had been tentative or uncertain, the show would have failed. However, he gave us a brilliantly realized character who actually evolved. Starting as a completely xenophobic misanthrope, he grows into the warm, grandfatherly character that we remember. He fluttered his fingers, he paused at odd moments, inserting lots of "hmms," and asked himself "I wonder" with regularity. Indeed, if Tom Baker had never played the role, I think Hartnell's would be remembered as being the most unpredictable and eccentric characterization of the Doctor. Watch him in "The Aztecs" or "The Time Meddler" and see how many facets he shows to his character. He rages, he lectures, he comforts, he jokes, he teases, he even flirts. It's a brilliant performance and laid the groundwork for everything that was to come.

There a couple of odd peculiarities about the First Doctor that I would be remiss in not addressing. First of all, the fluffing of the lines. Now, this is understandable given the sheer number of lines and the pace of production. He *usually* manages to get himself back on track; however, it does lead to some rather amusing moments. My personal favorite is "I can scent" it for "I can sense it" in "The War Machines." (The even use it on a loop in the DVD menu!) Second, there's the rather sad appearance in "The The Three Doctors." Hartnell was very ill at the time, and it shows--he does get off one great line, though, forever naming the Second and Third Doctors "a dandy and a clown." Brilliant, and it comes perfectly from this incarnation. Lastly, there's the odd business of Richard Hurndal in "The Five Doctors." Now, don't get me wrong, he gives a pretty good performance, but he is not William Hartnell, and, while it gives a flavor of Hartnell's Doctor, it simply can't capture the magic of the original.

So, all told, I encourage all two of you who read this to go back and watch, or rewatch, the First Doctor's stories. In a way, every subsequent Doctor has been playing a version of William Hartnell, adding shadings or emphasis, highlighting some aspects, limiting others, but always rooted in something that Billy did first. The Doctor has changed 9 times, and he's about to change for a tenth, but, in the end, we always come back to the solitary mysterious figure with his wonderful machine.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Prague Blog: Preliminary -- Why?

Since I decided to uproot my entire life, move to a country I have never visited, and train in a career I have no experience with, people have often asked me, "Why?" I'm sure that many of them likely were wondering 'WHY?!?!?!" but, if so, they were polite enough to hide that fact. So, here, as the first (unofficial, preliminary) installment of my Prague Blog, I thought I would try to make the case for why this isn't a completely ridiculous thing to do.

The first starting premise for this is probably a key facet of my personality: I don't like things. Not, "there are things I don't like," but rather, on the whole, I don't care about physical things. I am not a thing person.* To a lesser extent, but still worth mentioning, I am not a creature comforts person. It is true that I go a bit stir crazy when I don't have access to walkable shops, etc., and I do have a great fondness for hot and cold running water and HVAC , but my needs in t…

Prague Blog: Preliminary -- What I Leave Behind

This post if pretty melancholy, and more personal than I often get. If you want more like this (or less), one way to ask is to go to https://www.patreon.com/sjcaustenite, become a Patron, and then exercise your right to request something more cheerful in the future.


**********************

When I first made the decision to move to Prague, I focused solely on the opportuity it presented. Once the decision had been made, however, I started to think of practicalities. Like, how good is their internet speed? (About the same as the USA's, if not better.) How much are smokes? (About $4.50 USD--yes, I know I should quit, but I would rather quit because I want to rather than because it's too expensive.) What's the gay scene like? (So thriving the NYT did a piece on it.) Do they have Pizza Hut? (The chain is returning to Prague this year after a 13 year hiatus.)

Generally, the things that make my life not just tolerable but enjoyable will be available in abundance. Oh, to be sure, t…

Prague Blog: Preliminary -- The Things I'm Carrying, in Video Form

In Book II of the Iliad, Homer (let's just call the author that) enumerates the forces that sailed from Greece to lay siege on Troy, and then does a similar, smaller listing of the Trojan force. The "Catalogue of Ships," as it's known, stops the forward momentum of the epic to make sure the reader understands the scene on the plains outside Troy. At the same time, it establishes a great deal about the power dynamics at play, and provides us greater insight into the characters involved. Sometimes, what (or who) you own can speak volumes about who you are. In that spirit, but with none of the grandeur, I'm making a list of all the things I kept when I left my apartment and, more to the point, all the things I am taking to Prague with me.

The first category is things I'm keeping but not taking. This includes about a hundred books, mostly from my time at St. John's; a Johnnie chair, a college graduation present from my mother; various small items of sentiment…